Wednesday, June 30, 2021

Representation

 


- Quote from Netflix, "When it comes to black leading actors, directors, writers, and producers, they are representing, and it's not a moment, it's a movement."

- Netflix made a promise to represent black audiences authentically which hasn't always been Hollywood's priority. 

-The phrase #oscarssowhite was started in 2018 at the Oscars awards because for the second year in a row all 20 actors nominated for an Oscar award were white. 

- Some black actors boycotted the Oscars awards and demanded change, and this influenced the academy to promise to diversify in race and gender by 2020. 

-Apparently, it was said that Black Panther was proof that diversity sells making more than $700 million nationally and $1 Billion+ worldwide.

Thursday, June 24, 2021

Media regulation essay

"Changes in society have been reflected by changes in media regulation" Discuss this view. 

We can definitely see a clear change in media regulation being reflected through various changes in society. This is massively affecting the way people are releasing movies/TV shows, to try and not offend the vast majority of people now. In this essay, I will be focusing on some societal issues and controversies circulating around the major cases of censorship as well as the case study on China and how the Media is trying to appease China in order to make an appearance in their box office. Another point I will be going into is the cancel culture and why some TV shows/movies have been put under fire and even canceled because of this new culture being introduced. In New Zealand, the main regulatory bodies are The Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) is the government agency that is currently responsible for the classification of all films, videos, publications, and some video games in New Zealand. It was created by the aforementioned Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 and is an independent Crown entity.

Disney is a great example of "Changes in society have been reflected by changes in media regulation" with movies such as Dumbo and Song of the South. Because of the whole BLM (Black Lives Matter) movements that have been recently addressed, there have been pressures from society for Disney to censor the scenes in Dumbo in which the crows are in. This was due to the way the crows seemed to be presented in the scene as racially stereotyped black people in the time period it was set and the main crow being called Jim, referring to the racial slur "Jim crow". This flared up debates and controversy behind the scene, eventually putting so much pressure on Disney causing them to fully cancel and take the whole scene fully out of the movie when released on the Disney+ streaming service. Even Song of the south has been almost completely pulled from Disney history because it was seen as such a pro-racist movie and encouraged the enslavement of the black community. This sparked many controversies and the movie was never released on DVD, Blu-Ray, or VHS tape or on the Disney+ streaming service. Some people were very disappointed as it was a classic Walt Disney movie, but others are very happy about this because of the fact that many people think it was very racist, even though in actual fact it was not meant in this way and was actually quite a factual reality of what was actually being the thoughts of the time, as well as it being acceptable in those times and reflected the context of the time it was made.

We see censorship in TV broadcasting too, this is being affected by popular opinion and coming across in the form of cancel culture. Because of the whole agenda behind people hating on former president Donald Trump people have "canceled" his show "The apprentice" because many people see him as somebody who comes across as very misogynistic and racist. Because people and their perception of him have used cancel culture and its momentum to "cancel" this show that he created, even though it does not directly portray him and his views. This has also been happening to other shows and movies that seem to portray any views they do not agree with. 

Along with the BLM movement getting so much momentum, there have been so many censorings because anything that even seems remotely offensive is being taken out of movies and shows because it may come across as offensive to certain groups of people and people don't want this because in today's world everyone is soft and can't handle certain topics. The argument against this however is "how far does it go?" and this is true, where does it stop? and how far is too much? Also, who are the people we are giving all this power to? This means it is in whoever is in charge's hands and they can choose what they want and don't want being said and portrayed/ showed. And because of this, we can lose historical truths and people will become uneducated in what happened in the past, possibly causing us to repeat the same problems that others before us have made. The censoring of these movies/ Tv shows can also paint a false picture and this means whoever is censoring our media is almost re-writing the history of our media. My personal views on the topic are that they should put disclaimers at the start of movies informing the viewers if there are any unacceptable views in the film or show, and explain that these things may have been acceptable in those times rather than fully erasing that persons work and the history possibly portrayed in it. 

Another example of media regulation in the extreme is the whole China censorship in media and how they have a massive hold on what people can and cannot release and show in movies. This is because of the massive restrictions in the Chinese media and how only 34 foreign films are allowed into the Chinese box office (2nd largest box office earnings behind the USA). This means that producers and directors are very cautious about what gets into the final cut, and how they do almost anything to not offend or put China in a bad light because this causes them to lose massive revenue and can cause almost 'bad blood' with the Chinese media regulators making it harder for a possible sequel or another movie from that company to be released in the Chinese theatres again. Another example of this was with North Korea and how they were put in a bad light in the 2014 release of 'The Interview'. This ended up making the North Koreans want to retaliate and cause them to sent terrorist threats etc... causing the producers, directors, and distributors of 'The Interview' to change the release date after being hacked and to "appease" the North Korean "authorities" in a way. 

There are some good things coming out of media being censored, however, because so many kids and people under the age of 18 have either their own device or some form of internet access and this has resulted in the change in parents being the moral gatekeepers of kids are now watching and this has brought in the need for a "role model" of sought to censor what they are watching. 

"Manhunt" is an example of censorship in the video gaming world and something pulled/banned for good reasoning. Because of the gruesome and terrible gameplay involved with the game, it was banned in New Zealand, UK, Australia, Ireland, and possibly other countries. This I believe was a good decision by the censoring agencies in these countries, because it was a very terrible game that could be damaging to young viewers and even older viewers playing the game and this can dehumanize them and make these things almost seem fine to do anywhere. Especially now that parents no longer are watching and censoring what their kids watch and play on the internet and this ban helps these younger people in the gaming community to not be as exposed to this content. 

We also can see that in more cases regulation is necessary such as the Christchurch mosque shooting where the shooter recorded live on Facebook for thousands of millions of people around the world to watch. This was later taken down off Facebook but was recorded and put up on youtube and other places for others to watch after the event had happened. This was quickly dealt with and censored on all these sites so that people weren't viewing this horrific act. This in my view as well as the Manhunt game were good for the censoring agencies to jump on because they are very horrific and terrible content for even adult viewers.

The censoring of media in my view has caused massive problems in society making sure to only show viewers what they want to show them, and in a way "brainwashing" viewers into thinking in this way. This, in my view, is taking away the free will of people to watch and listen to what they want to, almost making the media in a way like a "communist media state". This can cause massive problems within society and over time it will become worse just making certain things normalized and made alright whereas other things are made to be bad and hated/ "canceled" in a sense. 




Video Game Censorship in NZ: Case Study

 Task 2:


Video Game Censorship in NZ: by Hunter Look

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Media Regulation: Case Study, "13 Reasons Why" & "Manhunt"

 


- 'Details about the movie':

-Creator: Brian Yorkey 

-Distributor: Netflix original

-Came out: 31st March 2017

-Directed by: Tom Mcarthy

-Available on: Netflix, Amazon Prime Video

- Where was it released? What countries?

- Released on: 30th March 2017, Netflix. 30th March 2017, Amazon Prime Video

- Countries released in: On Netflix, it was released worldwide, although in New Zealand it was banned for people under 18.

The controversy surrounding '13 Reasons why':

'13 Reasons Why 'prides itself on tackling difficult issues head-on, but its approach has resulted in many controversies. Based on Jay Asher's novel of the same name, '13 Reasons why arrived on Netflix in 2017. Its first season told the story of Hannah Baker's suicide, through a series of flashbacks that detailed the "13 reasons why" she had taken her own life.

Those reasons included a culture of bullying and drugs at her school, which resulted in many students making poor decisions and then trying to deal with the regrettable consequences. They also included rape and the revelation that Hannah and her friend, Jessica, had both been raped by the football captain, Bryce Walker. Not only were many of the scenes triggering for viewers, but Hannah's suicide was shown in graphic detail, prompting an outcry across social media.

https://screenrant.com/13-reasons-why-controversy-explained/

- What rating did the NZ classifications board give it? Why?:

The Office of Film and Literature Classification consulted with the Mental Health Foundation in classifying 13 Reasons Why as RP18 An RP18 classification means that someone under 18 must be supervised by a parent or guardian when viewing the series. A guardian is considered to be a responsible adult (18 years and over), for example, a family member or teacher who can provide guidance.) with a warning that it contains rape, suicide themes, drug use, and bullying.

https://www.classificationoffice.govt.nz/news/latest-news/chief-censor-applies-rp18-classification-to-13-reasons-why-season-2/

- What was the rating in other countries?:

It was deemed by the BBFC as a 15+ rated movie on Netflix and any other streaming services. 


"Manhunt":

Brief overview of manhunt the videogame:

"Manhunt" is a 2003 stealth and survival horror game developed by Rockstar North and published by Rockstar Games, originally released for the PlayStation 2 in November 2003, and for Microsoft Windows and Xbox in April 2004. "Manhunt" was released through the PlayStation Network for the PlayStation 3 in 2013 and PlayStation 4 in 2016. Set within the fictional Carcer City, the story follows James Earl Cash, a death row prisoner who is forced to participate in a series of snuff films, earning his freedom by murdering criminal gang members sent to hunt him on camera.

The game received positive reviews from critics, with particular praise directed at its dark tone and violent nature, winning several accolades and gaining a substantial cult following. "Manhunt" was subject to a significant video game controversy due to the level of graphic violence depicted, banned in several countries, and was implicated in a murder by the UK media, although this accusation was later rejected by the police and courts. Manhunt spawned the sequel Manhunt 2 in 2007, with new characters and a new story. As of March 2008, the Manhunt series has collectively sold 1.7 million copies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhunt_(video_game)

-Developers: Rockstar North

-Publishers: Rockstar Games

-Producers: Andy Hay, and, Leslie Benzies

-Release date and platforms released on: Playstation 2 in the USA November 19, 2003. Playstation 2 in Europe November 21st, 2003. On Xbox, and windows in USA  April 20, 2004. On Xbox, and windows in Europe April 23, 2004

-Controversy: The controversy surrounding the game stems primarily from the graphic manner in which the player executes enemies. In 2007, former Rockstar employee Jeff Williams revealed that even the game's staff were somewhat uncomfortable about the level of violence; "there was almost a mutiny at the company over that game." Williams explained that the game "just made us all feel icky. It was all about the violence, and it was realistic violence. We all knew there was no way we could explain away that game. There was no way to rationalize it. We were crossing a line."

The violence in the game drew the attention of U.S. Representative Joe Baca, who was the sponsor of legislation to fine those who sell adult-themed games to players younger than 17. Baca said of Manhunt, "it's telling kids how to kill someone, and it uses vicious, sadistic and cruel methods to kill". The media was also drawn into the debate. For example, The Globe and Mail wrote "Manhunt is a venal disconnect for the genre. There's no challenge, just assembly-line, ritualistic slaughter. It's less a video game and more a weapon of personal destruction. This is about stacking bodies. Perhaps the scariest fact of all: Manhunt is so user-friendly that any sharp 12-year-old could navigate through the entire game in one sitting." 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhunt_(video_game)


-Age rating: 18+ around the world, but banned in UK, Australia, and New Zealand.








Monday, June 14, 2021

Censorship in media

1.)  Examples of censorship happening with Disney plus. What and why? 


1.) "Song of the south" has been made to not go on the Disney+, because it is seen as racist to African American people and shows how they were oppressed around the 1940s and earlier even. Because of this, it was removed from the Disney+ streaming service because of the "offensive" nature of the film.

"Dumbo" was also edited and censored from the original version, because of the crows which were represented as black men using black voice actors and even calling one of the crows "Jim Crow" which in those times was a derogatory term for black men. Also, the crows were very upbeat and almost perceived as cackling crows which put bad lighting on the black people, coming across as racist to the public. 


2.) Examples of censorship in other countries

2.) Other examples of censorship are places such as China, North Korea, and even in the UK with Sister Streetfighter. 

China - China now only allows 34 foreign films into the cinemas each year, mostly from Hollywood, this shows their massive censorship of movies. One such film which was allowed to get into cinemas but was censored because of nudity, this film was the shape of water, and it was only allowed to come in after the scene of nudity was censored and the woman whose back was turned to the camera was naked and you could see a bareback, this was then censored and changed to her wearing a black tube dress to cover her up and was then allowed to be screened in Chinese cinemas.

North Korea - They did not allow the movie "The Interview" to be screened in the cinemas or on disk, because of the way it depicted their country in a bad light as well as their leader Kim-Jong Un.

UK (Great Britain) - The Movie "Sister Streetfighter" was censored in the UK because of a poster in the villain's lair which showed a young child being sexualized with an adult. This was very uncomfortable for viewers as it was for around 30 seconds in the background and crossed a very clear and obviously wrong line, this then meant that it was censored and removed in the UK. 

3.) Points for/against censorship as presented in this clip - should art be censored?

3.) For:

- If you censor art you are changing someone's own work, which you don't have the right to do.

- You are changing the history, almost erasing that piece out of everything which can lead to people making the same mistake because of lack of education. 

- If it is their own it is acceptable but if it is from someone else then this is not ok. 

Against:

- I believe if it clearly crosses a line such as anything inappropriate involving children this should be able to be censored because this is clearly wrong and violating an innocent child. The counterargument for this though is that where does it stop? And who gets to choose what becomes censored? 

"if something is wrong but it is part of history, should it be cut out as to not offend people today?" 

- I believe no. This is because it is that person's art, you actually have no right to change it, however, if the artist retracts their work that is acceptable however because they should have the right to do this. Also, it is a part of history and you can not just erase it as it erases education which could allow similar issues to arise because people were not seen the things not to do and see the line not to cross. It de-educates people. I believe there should be disclaimers in this instance about how this may have been acceptable in this time period etc...


Tuesday, June 8, 2021

Social Media Research

Task 1:

For our social media page, we have decided to use Instagram over Facebook this year. There are few reasons for this choice and these are...

- There are around 1 billion daily users.

- The biggest age bracket is 25-34 at 33.1% which is larger than Facebook's which is only 26.3% 

- There are also more females using Instagram (57% of users) which is more of our target audience and on Facebook, there is actually a larger % of men using it out of the people who use Facebook. (56%). 

- The growth of Instagram is actually faster and more widespread than Facebook so it will soon overtake it, from the predictions.

- There is also a larger % of the younger age group using Instagram rather than Facebook which is more of a target audience we are aiming for, and Facebook is seen as a more "boomer" social media platform. 

Although there are things pointing to using Facebook we chose Instagram instead. Some points that could have influenced us to choose Facebook are...

Despite ongoing controversies, “apocalypses” and ever-emerging competition, Facebook still remains the most-used and engaged social platform. 

- Due to Facebook’s sheer size and engagement rate, it makes sense to advertise there in some way, shape, or form (even if that means cross-posting).

In fact, Facebook's ad revenue and general usage have been up in the midst of COVID-19. Again, the platform remains many people’s “home base” when it comes to social media.

Here are 2 graphs of Facebook and Instagram's distribution of user's worldwide, by age bracket:

Facebook:


Instagram:

This shows the massive difference in the amount of usage for young users, which is our main target audience and this is just to back up the fact of the number of users in the respective age groups.

Another graph I have used to put my point of using Instagram over Facebook...











This shows the massive difference in teens using Instagram in the U.S. which is where the biggest market predominantly is.


Some more points on why I have chosen Instagram:

Instagram’s user growth has been steady and consistent, especially among the younger crowd.

-Building on the point above, Instagram’s users are among the most dedicated in terms of how frequently they log in.

-The sheer number of app downloads signals the importance of mobile optimization for your Instagram Marketing strategy.


Another graph:













Here is a graph showing that it may be better to use Facebook for Social Ads, but the data for everything else gives us the sense to use Instagram.

Tuesday, June 1, 2021

Media regulation Research

Task 1:

Choose 5 major censorship and regulatory events from the list in the link that impacted NZ media regulation in our history, that you feel are significant and write a brief summary of what they were;

1.) 1892: The Offensive Publications Act 1892 was New Zealand's first censorship legislation

- Before 1892 customs was the one regulating indecent material coming into New Zealand but in 1892 the first censorship legislation was enacted.
- The act banned any picture or printed or written matter which was of an indecent, immoral, or obscene nature, which included advertisements relating to such matters as venereal disease. 
- Act was later replaced by the police offenses act in 1908 and revised again 2 years later.


2.) 1916: From March 1916 the Government had the power to ban films about the war in Europe

This act banned any films of the wars, especially WW2 because it discouraged people from recruiting for the military. A film in Timaru depicting the deaths and wounded was the reason for this movement to commence.

3.1920s: A system of graded age recommendations was introduced
"The 1916 Act also made provision for films to be restricted to specified classes of persons. This provision was rarely used before the 1950s, when age restrictions, such as R16, became common. In 1920 however, a system of recommendary classifications was introduced."

- Back before R ratings, G and M ratings were used a 'U' rating was used if the media was suitable for anyone, and an 'A' rating was used if it was only suitable for Adults or a more mature audience, and it was up to the parents to censor their children's media. 

"In 1920 the Legislative Council, Parliament's upper house, debated the need to 'strengthen and make more drastic the censorship of cine-films ... with the object of eliminating the noxious elements which are tending to destroy the moral sense of so many young persons.'

4.) 1938: Comics banned under the new import licensing regulations


"Comic books were initially reprints of newspaper comic strips. During the 1930s, these became orientated more towards action, violence, romance, and adventure with the likes of Buck Rogers becoming popular. Action and violence became more predominant from 1937, when comic books started to feature original material, thus removing the restrictions imposed by the family orientation of most newspapers. Superheroes such as Batman and Superman appeared on the scene..."

- In 1938 a deputation met with the Ministers of Customs and Education to discuss their concern about comic books. Later that year several comics were banned under the new import licensing regulations, which restricted publications placing 'undue emphasis' on sex, obscenity, horror, crime, and cruelty.

5.) 1976: The Cinematograph Films Act 1976 introduces the idea of 'injury to the public good'

"When introducing the 1976 Bill to Parliament, Internal Affairs Minister Alan Highet made it clear that his intention was to liberalize film censorship. He hoped, he said, that New Zealand would 'move towards the maturity of attitude whereby the abolition of censorship for adults can eventually become a reality."

The fundamentals of the Act as they relate to censorship still stand. Out went the references to 'public order and decency' dating from the 1916 Act. The sensor was required to determine only whether a film 'is or is not likely to be injurious to the public good'. In determining injuriousness to the public good, the censor was required to take into account a number of specific criteria. These included:

-the likely effect of the film on its audience; 

 -its artistic or other merits;

-the way in which the film depicts anti-social behavior, cruelty, violence, crime, horror, sex, etc;

-the 'extent and degree to which the film denigrates any particular class of the general public by reference to the color, race, or ethnic or national origins, the sex, or the religious beliefs of the members of that class';

-other relevant circumstances, such as likely time and place of the exhibition'.

 Task 2:

1.)  Write down some key points about who is in control of censorship in NZ

- Censorship in NZ has been around since 1850 and is now being run by the "office of film and literature classification". Under the act in 1993 called the "Films, videos, and publications classifications in 1993". (OFLC) is the government agency that is currently responsible for the classification of all films, videos, publications, and some video games in New Zealand. It was created by the aforementioned Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 and is an independent crown entity. The head of the OFLC is called the Chief Censor, maintaining a title that has described the government officials in charge of censorship in New Zealand since 1916.

2.) Write down what the first video game banned in NZ was and why

- Manhunt was the first game banned in New Zealand for graphic violence and depictions of cruelty.

3.) Write down the main points to note about the films, videos, and publications classifications act of 1993 and how that changed things in NZ for media regulation.

The passage of the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 merged the previously separate Indecent Publications Tribunal, Chief Censor of Films, and the Video Recordings Authority into a single agency, the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC). This agency presides over censorship in New Zealand to this day.

Under this Act, films, videos, DVDs, and video games have to go through the OFLC for classification and labeling, while books, magazines, music, and newspapers are only processed when a complaint is raised about them by a third party. While it was always mandatory for a film to have a physical label displaying its classification, similar rules for print media were not put into place until 2005, where an amendment to the Act required that print media given a restricted classification have a physical label denoting this classification.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_New_Zealand

Post-Prelim work Thursday:

  Article #1- TheSpinoff   Notes: Confronting new research shows just how fast traditional media lost young NZ. Over the last 10 years, we h...